Farm Laws Repeal 2021: BJP’s Tactical U-Turn for Electoral Gains

The three controversial farm laws were passed by Parliament in September 2020 with minimal debate and without proper consultation with farmers’ unions. Farmers, especially from Punjab, Haryana, and western Uttar Pradesh, feared the laws would gradually dismantle the Minimum Support Price (MSP) system and the mandi (APMC) structure.

After more than a year of intense protests at Delhi’s borders, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced on 19 November 2021 that the government would repeal all three farm laws. BBC News

Parliament formally passed the Farm Laws Repeal Bill on 29 November 2021. PRS India

Why This Is a “Gem”

  1. Timing Reveals Political Motive: The repeal came just weeks before the crucial Uttar Pradesh and Punjab assembly elections scheduled for early 2022. Political observers widely noted that sustained farmer anger posed a significant electoral risk for the BJP in these key states. AP News
  2. No Admission of Policy Flaw: In his televised address, PM Modi claimed the laws were brought “for the welfare of farmers” but “we could not explain” their benefits properly. He stopped short of accepting whether or not the laws themselves were flawed or harmful to farmers’ interests. BBC News
  3. Protests Forced the Hand, Not Genuine Reconsideration: For over a year, the government had defended the laws as “historic reforms” and dismissed the protests. The sudden U-turn happened only when the movement showed no signs of ending and began affecting the party’s electoral prospects. Stimson Center
  4. Core Farmer Demands Ignored: Even after repeal, the government did not provide a legal guarantee for MSP — one of the farmers’ main demands — indicating that the decision was more about damage control than addressing the structural concerns of Indian agriculture.

The Real Impact on Farmers

The repeal brought immediate relief by preserving the existing mandi system and MSP procurement in several states. However, it failed to deliver long-term solutions:

  • Over 700 farmers died during the year-long protest due to harsh conditions, illness, and other hardships. Al Jazeera
  • The core demand for a legal guarantee of MSP for all crops remained unaddressed.
  • No meaningful agricultural reforms were introduced afterward. Issues like rising input costs, debt burden, lack of crop diversification, and water scarcity continued to affect small and marginal farmers.
  • The status quo was restored, but Indian agriculture remained trapped in structural inefficiency, with farmers receiving only a small share of the final consumer price.

The repeal saved the BJP from further electoral damage in Uttar Pradesh and Punjab, but did little to resolve the deeper crisis facing millions of Indian farmers.

Gems of BJP documents such cases to create a permanent, evidence-based public record. Our goal is not to oppose any political party, but to highlight instances where policies, decisions, or actions appear to undermine fairness, due process, equal protection, and institutional integrity for Indian citizens.
Have you witnessed or experienced similar issues?

Submit your evidence (anonymously if preferred) via our submission form. Verified cases with supporting documents will be added to the archive.